This isn't a story in the traditional sense. It's a critical essay, a 100-page argument where Tolstoy lays out his case against William Shakespeare. He starts by confessing that, despite trying for decades, he has never felt the 'aesthetic emotion' others get from Shakespeare's work. He then goes play-by-play, focusing mainly on 'King Lear,' picking apart what he sees as unrealistic characters, illogical plots, and clumsy morality. Tolstoy argues that Shakespeare's fame is not earned, but is the result of German critics and a public too afraid to question the hype.

Why You Should Read It

You should read this because it forces you to think. Even if you adore Shakespeare, Tolstoy's anger is so specific and his points are so forcefully made that you can't just dismiss him. It makes you defend what you love. I found myself yelling at the book, then going back to 'Hamlet' to see if he had a point. It's less about agreeing with Tolstoy and more about witnessing a brilliant, stubborn mind dissect an idol. The passion is undeniable. You feel his genuine bewilderment and frustration that the whole world sees genius where he sees failure.

Final Verdict

This is perfect for anyone who loves a great debate, for Shakespeare fans with a strong stomach, and for writers who want to see how criticism can be both brutal and deeply personal. It's not for people who want a balanced, scholarly analysis. This is Tolstoy's raw, unfiltered opinion, and it's a thrilling, infuriating ride. Don't read it to learn about Shakespeare; read it to have a fiery conversation with one of history's other great authors.